OLE Project Update

Post comments regarding this morning breakout session presented by Marianne Gaunt, Grace Agnew, and Christopher Sterback (Rutgers).

How is this project different from other similar projects and where are we now?

Marianne mentioned that RU is thinking about becoming a build partner on the Mellon project.

Grace reminded us that going Open Source (OS) does not save us money. Also, that you won’t necessarily get every customization in an OLS that you want. So why go OS?

  • The MARC format does not work well for digital resources. A lot of ILS were coded a long time ago and rely on the MARC format.
  • The concept of holdings is changing also — see plans for NJVid for example where 2+ schools may share the same resource.
  • What is a patron? It could be 2 universities collaborating on an online course. An ILS does not necessary support this and other types of patrons, its focus is on circulating books.
  • The ILS does not play well with other university information systems.
  • Financial terms are set by ILS vendors and we have little say in the fees that get charged.
  • Mergers with ILS vendors end up costing us more and requiring more of our time.
  • The OLE project is not excluding other libraries — say public libraries for example. The project is designed to support VALE.
  • The system will not be hardwired to support what Rutgers does.
  • OLE is a SOA architecture.
  • The OLE project is funded by Mellon to fit in with a larger higher education application environment — i.e., it recognizes that the library applications must exist with other higher ed applications.
  • OLE will support MARC but is not MARC. Students don’t like MARC, they don’t understand, let it go.

Chris Sterback reviewed some points about the project & workshops:

  • Project participants are very diverse, energetic and full of exciting ideas (14 universities)
  • Regional workshops are coming to an end. RU hosted 2 workshops at the end of last year. They were well attended.
  • Attendees brainstormed top 10 core processes. The models created during our regional workshops will be combined with models from the other workshops held around the world.
  • The OLE project design team will be meeting again in about 10 days.
  • There are many opportunities for participation. What should VALE do — data prep, ongoing workflow analysis, local communication, policy discussions. Does VALE need a webpage on OLE? A listserv?
  • At this point, Chris asked for input from the audience:
Advertisements
Posted in 2009 Users' Conference. Tags: , , , . Comments Off on OLE Project Update

Keynote Address: Marianne I. Gaunt, Rutgers University Libraries

Link to this presentation:

Key Note Address — VALE: A Ten Year Start into the Future

Post comments regarding her talk titled, VALE: A Ten Year Start into the Future.

At the end of her talk, Marianne I. Gaunt welcomed comments re: issues that we (VALE members libraries) need to address in the future from the floor:

  1. Establishing better vendor relationships/deals — similar to some of the deals done in California
  2. More participation in VALE reciprocal borrowing agreements — goal of 100% at both graduate & undergraduate levels
  3. Get more participation from all research libraries in the state, not just Rutgers
  4. Collaborate with NJLA
  5. Reminder that the issues faced by academic libraries in NJ are really the same issues faced by all types of libraries and NJ and VALE should collaborate with them
  6. Let’s look at the statewide curriculum, libraries need to be part of the development of the curriculum
  7. Reciprocal borrowing needs to include non-print materials also
  8. Pool our resources to acquire better deals on non-print materials
Posted in 2009 Users' Conference. Tags: , , . Comments Off on Keynote Address: Marianne I. Gaunt, Rutgers University Libraries